Short Papers:
Approximately every three weeks (week 4, week 7, week 11, week 14) students
will write short papers (1.5 to 2 pages single-spaced, 1000-1250 words) that
either directly apply concepts and genre under discussion or that summarize
some of the readings from the previous two weeks and then apply that theory
to an object in the field (a web site, a technical document, a workspace or
workplace, etc.). I will typically give two or three options in the daily
syllabus (generally straight out of Peeples). These options are meant as
conceptual starting places for invention, not as mandates. Students should
feel free to pursue other prompts out of Peeples or contact me if they are
unsure whether an ulterior paper idea meets the goals for that section. After
writing the paper, students will then bring in enough print copies for their
peer review group and will deliver the paper orally to the entire class. We will
spend the class period listening to the papers and commenting on them orally.
Students from the reading group will take home the paper copies and comment on
them in more detail. I will also comment on them, grade them, and ultimately
average those for the short paper grade. Students will need to take the
commentary given orally in class, by the peer review group, and by me and revise
the papers for their final portfolios.
In week 11, I will ask everyone to incorporate technology into their presentation
of the short paper for that week. This could include a web page, a PowerPoint
presentation, a brochure, or some other document that requires extra technical skill
and preparation. Students will have an extra week of class to work on the specific
tech skills develop the presentation. If no other technology or genre applies to the paper's topic,
students should create a PowerPoint version of their paper. The PowerPoint should
function both as an aid for oral delivery and as a visual representation of
the argument. In other words, the headlines and bullets should go beyond topic
and subtopic to claim and support. Make sure the conceptual connections are made
explicit in the visuals. This may create slightly more text but should generate
more comprehension. Students may read their papers and click through the presentation
but it will be more appropriate, and hopefully affective, to talk through the
presentation. Presentations will get up to 5 participation points instead of the typical 1.
Short papers will be graded as always.
Final Portfolio:
Each student will compile a portfolio (paper or virtual) of past and current
writing projects related to professional, technical, or editorial work
set against the backdrop of course readings and discussions. The portfolio should
include revised short papers from the semester along with solid examples of your
best technical writing, writing for magazines or newspapers, creative nonfiction,
or web writing. The portfolio should also contain an end-of-semester
reflective essay (1250-1500 words) that examines the work included in the portfolio
in the light of the class readings and rhetorical theories discussed over the
semester. While the bulk of material is important, a strong cover essay that makes
connections between the work in the portfolio and the issues and concepts discussed
over the semester is critical. Portfolios will receive a letter grade.
For more see the full assignment.
Participation:
Participation will consist of weekly blog posts, blog comments, class attendance,
presentations, peer reviews, any attendance at technology workshops or labs, and
any other minor exercises that require non-trivial effort. These will be tallied
and averaged. Again, don't be lulled into thinking this work doesn't count.
(See percentages below.)
Percentages:
The following is a breakdown of percentages.
| Blog/Participation | 20 % |
| Short Papers | 40 % |
| Portfolio | 40 % |
| ------- |
| 100 % |