|
A (4 pts)=Excellent B=(3 pts) Good=C (2 pts) Satisfactory= D (1 pt) Poor Titit/subject of project:________________________________________ Names of creators/presenters: :___________________________
___________________________
RATE YOUR RESPONSES: A. When you look at the site,
do you have a strong sense of the cyberculture?
B. How well does the introductory
material inform you about the cyberculture?
C. How well do the non-textual
elements contribute to the persona of the cyberculture?
D. How comprehensive is the
research undertaken for this academic research project? [i.e.: use of evidence
from credible print and online sources, appropriate documentation
of sources, in-text and in the bibliography, in APA style, so readers can
find the original sources, use of a wide variety of sources, etc.]
E. How well does the project
use these sources to enrich the content and inform the audience for this
cyberculture?
F. How coherent is the cyberculture
Web site as a whole? [Do the elements work together, graphical, textual,
(and multimedia, if included)? Are there disjuncts in ideas and/or
presentation/form?]
G. How well do you
think this cyberculture Web site reinforces a sense of community that will
help bring together people with similar interests?
H. Is the cyberculture Web
site easy to navigate? [Do you find what you expect to find when you follow
links? Can you always get "home"? Are you abruptly thrust out of
the project into external material without a clear purpose? Does each page
have links to all components of the report?]
I. How much did you learn
from visiting the cyberculture site? My experience was:
J. How pleasurable was the
process of experiencing this cyberculture? My experience was:
Total number of points (Add up the score for each question): _____________ |